⤿ 3D ⤾

↺

𖦹Eissentam (10) is a Lush galaxy

⊞ Quadrant Gamma γ

◲ Sector 4
▗ Block 4
☐¹ Cube 1

◇ Region « Arfost Void »
Reachable

This Region is Reachable
it's neither in the Fade or the Core

⬌West - East axis X -406

Near Central Axis
↤ West Spatial Progression
Close to the center

⬌Top - Bottom axis Y 0

⬌North - South axis Z 1583

Intermediate Longitudinal Zone
↧ South Spatial Progression
At the very top or bottom regions

R₀ ≈ 653 694 light years from the core

Navigate to Adjacent Regions

➔ to Quadrant Gamma γ
➔ to Galaxy Eissentam

➔ to the Homepage

Few dare to venture into « Arfost Void ». Welcome

0062FE6A
Found within the Quadrant Gamma γ of Eissentam, ≈ 653 694 light years from the galactic core

At 653 694 light years from the core, the region is Reachable ! This part of the galaxy is often passed by, but it holds more than meets the eye

Unseen by most, this region is a vast mystery, uncharted and unexplored

Explorers speak of this place with a kind of quiet appreciation, despite its obscurity

Known Systems in this Region

Name	Spectral	Locals	Wealth	Conflict	Address
➔ Region's Black Hole		10790062FE6A
➔ Local Atlas Station		107A0062FE6A
➔ System at Random		⚃ ⚅ ⚃ ⚁
➔ Random Purple System		⚁ ⚂ ⚅ ⚄

Nearby Known Regions

➔ Ogrlio Spur	FE631E6B	1 200 ly away
➔ Bobindibl Expanse	FE639E71	4 948 ly away
➔ Ajhwana Fringe	0262BE53	9 372 ly away
➔ Gopland Shallows	00645E74	9 666 ly away
➔ Kiffit Nebula	FE62AE50	10 621 ly away
➔ Luyteno Boundary	0361FE54	10 947 ly away
➔ Buwariz Expanse	FE626E4D	12 172 ly away
➔ Juttema Band	FC60FE64	13 121 ly away
➔ Sayloc Quadrant	FC653E7B	16 005 ly away
➔ Henoulot Terminus	0363AE95	17 794 ly away
➔ Osentie	FF61AE97	19 868 ly away
➔ Yorubaku Quadrant	03609E48	20 431 ly away
➔ Ohtani Mass	FE5F8E69	22 018 ly away
➔ Latbeeti Nebula	FD5F8E69	22 036 ly away
➔ Yuldemov Expanse	0163BEA3	23 303 ly away

Recently visited

all my glyphs ➔

The name of this region, “Arfost Void”, is generated based on its coordinates. It’s an educated guess — probably close to the real name, but not guaranteed. It's an approximation, just what the engine of glyphs.had.sh thinks it might be

➔ return to the home page

➔back to top