S
N
E
W
⤿ 3D ⤾
↺
𖦹Eissentam (10) is a Lush galaxy
⬌West - East axis X 616
Near Central Axis
↦ East Spatial Progression
Close to the center
⬌Top - Bottom axis Y 2
Very Close to Galactic Equator
↟ Upper Spatial Progression
Almost touching the middle of the galaxy
⬌North - South axis Z -1543
Intermediate Longitudinal Zone
↥ North Spatial Progression
At the very top or bottom regions
R₀ ≈ 664 567 light years from the core
You're in uncharted space now — « Eugetl Cloud »
029F9268Positioned within the Quadrant Beta β of Eissentam, approximately ≈ 664 567 light years from the galactic core
At 664 567 light years from the core, the region is Reachable ! The perfect place to explore new systems, while the galaxy hums with energy
A place of the unknown, where no one has ventured before
Lost in the depths of the unknown, this region’s beauty is an enigma that few have witnessed
Known Systems in this Region
| Name | Spectral | Locals | Wealth | Conflict | Address |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➔ Region's Black Hole | 1079029F9268 | ||||
| ➔ Local Atlas Station | 107A029F9268 | ||||
| ➔ System at Random | ⚃ ⚅ ⚃ ⚁ | ||||
| ➔ Random Purple System | ⚁ ⚂ ⚅ ⚄ | ||||
Nearby Known Regions
Tools:
- Orbit: mouse
- Zoom: scroll wheel
- Pan: right click
- FPS:
- Orbit: mouse
- Zoom: scroll wheel
- Pan: right click
- FPS:
| ➔ Idubhe Cluster | 029FA267 | 566 ly away |
| ➔ Dasonaik | FEA14263 | 11 100 ly away |
| ➔ Noainentt Expanse | FD9EA251 | 11 164 ly away |
| ➔ Hiince Sector | FD9EA250 | 11 496 ly away |
| ➔ Jukulha Band | FFA16269 | 11 669 ly away |
| ➔ Pushdow Adjunct | FE9E824A | 13 885 ly away |
| ➔ Kefurag Nebula | FCA1B261 | 14 091 ly away |
| ➔ Zetateln Instability | 02A1C27A | 15 743 ly away |
| ➔ Wegcoba Expanse | FE9E3240 | 18 330 ly away |
| ➔ Enries Void | 039E8238 | 20 373 ly away |
| ➔ Bulythe Conflux | FFA26288 | 22 120 ly away |
| ➔ Eshvem Instability | FEA26289 | 22 379 ly away |
The name of this region, “Eugetl Cloud”, is generated based on its coordinates.
It’s an educated guess — probably close to the real name, but not guaranteed. It's an approximation, just what the engine of glyphs.had.sh thinks it might be