⤿ 3D ⤾

↺

𖦹Eissentam (10) is a Lush galaxy

⊞ Quadrant Beta β

◲ Sector 4
▗ Block 4
☐³ Cube 3

◇ Region « Baalsu Boundary »
Reachable

This Region is Reachable
it's neither in the Fade or the Core

⬌West - East axis X 1665

Outer Coordinate Boundary
↦ East Spatial Progression
In the blurry outer surroundings

⬌Top - Bottom axis Y -14

Very Close to Galactic Equator
↡ Lower Spatial Progression
Almost touching the middle of the galaxy

⬌North - South axis Z -159

Galactic Central Plane
↥ North Spatial Progression
Right in the middle of the galaxy

R₀ ≈ 669 053 light years from the core

Navigate to Adjacent Regions

➔ to Quadrant Beta β
➔ to Galaxy Eissentam

➔ to the Homepage

It's not on most maps, but you found « Baalsu Boundary »

F2F61681
Situated in the Quadrant Beta β of Eissentam, roughly ≈ 669 053 light years away from the galactic core

At 669 053 light years from the core, the region is Reachable ! A region full of life and energy, but where tranquility reigns supreme

The mysteries of this unknown region stretch beyond imagination

This unexplored realm may be unknown to most, but its beauty is the stuff of legends

Known Systems in this Region

Name	Spectral	Locals	Wealth	Conflict	Address
➔ Region's Black Hole		1079F2F61681
➔ Local Atlas Station		107AF2F61681
➔ System at Random		⚃ ⚅ ⚃ ⚁
➔ Random Purple System		⚁ ⚂ ⚅ ⚄

Nearby Known Regions

➔ Arm of Eeponr	F6F62683	1 833 ly away
➔ Sizneky Adjunct	00F80680	13 612 ly away
➔ Nosdorf Sector	04F6A65E	16 149 ly away
➔ Fowlerb Cluster	00F7265D	16 881 ly away
➔ Srodayap Quadrant	03F6165A	17 018 ly away
➔ Lelcala Instability	03F5365A	17 915 ly away
➔ Apreta Mass	FFF4B659	18 986 ly away
➔ Rakash Cluster	00F456A5	19 083 ly away
➔ The Arm of Avesca	00F456A6	19 387 ly away
➔ Sea of Rocuncel	FFF86661	20 246 ly away
➔ Niyakawal Void	FDF8465B	21 128 ly away
➔ Kekeelo Void	FFF756B6	23 248 ly away

Recently visited

all my glyphs ➔

The name of this region, “Baalsu Boundary”, is generated based on its coordinates. It’s an educated guess — probably close to the real name, but not guaranteed. It's an approximation, just what the engine of glyphs.had.sh thinks it might be

➔ return to the home page

➔back to top