S
N
E
W
⤿ 3D ⤾
↺
𖦹Eissentam (10) is a Lush galaxy
⬌West - East axis X -503
Near Central Axis
↤ West Spatial Progression
Close to the center
⬌Top - Bottom axis Y -3
Very Close to Galactic Equator
↡ Lower Spatial Progression
Almost touching the middle of the galaxy
⬌North - South axis Z 1546
Intermediate Longitudinal Zone
↧ South Spatial Progression
At the very top or bottom regions
R₀ ≈ 650 309 light years from the core
« Sea of Egleyz ». No records. No stories. Let's make some
FD60AE09Positioned in the Quadrant Gamma γ of Eissentam, approximately ≈ 650 309 light years from the center of the galaxy
At 650 309 light years from the core, the region is Reachable ! A space between the known and the unknown—perfect for discovery
A region so far removed, even the stars remain silent about it
Though no one has charted it, many believe this unknown region to be one of the galaxy's most beautiful
Known Systems in this Region
| Name | Spectral | Locals | Wealth | Conflict | Address |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➔ Region's Black Hole | 1079FD60AE09 | ||||
| ➔ Local Atlas Station | 107AFD60AE09 | ||||
| ➔ System at Random | ⚃ ⚅ ⚃ ⚁ | ||||
| ➔ Random Purple System | ⚁ ⚂ ⚅ ⚄ | ||||
Nearby Known Regions
Tools:
- Orbit: mouse
- Zoom: scroll wheel
- Pan: right click
- FPS:
- Orbit: mouse
- Zoom: scroll wheel
- Pan: right click
- FPS:
| ➔ Eeholor Sector | FC60AE07 | 894 ly away |
| ➔ Unuakeb Terminus | 00614E03 | 4 817 ly away |
| ➔ Wufellenia Shallows | 00600E00 | 5 514 ly away |
| ➔ Bijemadhi | 0160ADF8 | 6 986 ly away |
| ➔ Nujamit Cluster | FE617E17 | 7 652 ly away |
| ➔ Pigella Sector | FD618E1C | 9 440 ly away |
| ➔ Evdokip Mass | 00619E1E | 10 392 ly away |
| ➔ Tukoveli Expanse | 0361AE1F | 11 143 ly away |
| ➔ Ugdunei Cluster | FF61EE21 | 12 522 ly away |
| ➔ Dohensi | 02603DE1 | 16 366 ly away |
| ➔ Imalcadre | FE603DD9 | 19 407 ly away |
| ➔ Viushi Shallows | FE600DD8 | 20 008 ly away |
The name of this region, “Sea of Egleyz”, is generated based on its coordinates.
It’s an educated guess — probably close to the real name, but not guaranteed. It's an approximation, just what the engine of glyphs.had.sh thinks it might be