⤿ 3D ⤾

↺

𖦹Eissentam (10) is a Lush galaxy

⊞ Quadrant Beta β

◰ Sector 1
▗ Block 4
☐¹ Cube 1

◇ Region « Ucerie Cloud »
Reachable

This Region is Reachable
it's neither in the Fade or the Core

⬌West - East axis X 610

Near Central Axis
↦ East Spatial Progression
Close to the center

⬌Top - Bottom axis Y -2

Very Close to Galactic Equator
↡ Lower Spatial Progression
Almost touching the middle of the galaxy

⬌North - South axis Z -1514

Intermediate Longitudinal Zone
↥ North Spatial Progression
At the very top or bottom regions

R₀ ≈ 652 907 light years from the core

Navigate to Adjacent Regions

➔ to Quadrant Beta β
➔ to Galaxy Eissentam

➔ to the Homepage

« Ucerie Cloud ». No records. No stories. Let's make some

FEA16262
Positioned within the Quadrant Beta β of Eissentam, approximately ≈ 652 907 light years from the galactic core

At 652 907 light years from the core, the region is Reachable ! Space feels familiar here, but it’s still filled with untold stories

This is uncivilized space — wild, untouched, and full of secrets

Lost in the vastness, this unknown region is rumored to be one of the galaxy’s most beautiful

Known Systems in this Region

Name	Spectral	Locals	Wealth	Conflict	Address
➔ Region's Black Hole		1079FEA16262
➔ Local Atlas Station		107AFEA16262
➔ System at Random		⚃ ⚅ ⚃ ⚁
➔ Random Purple System		⚁ ⚂ ⚅ ⚄

Nearby Known Regions

➔ Dasonaik	FEA14263	894 ly away
➔ Kefurag Nebula	FCA1B261	2 191 ly away
➔ Jukulha Band	FFA16269	2 828 ly away
➔ Zetateln Instability	02A1C27A	10 024 ly away
➔ Idubhe Cluster	029FA267	11 489 ly away
➔ Bulythe Conflux	FFA26288	16 497 ly away
➔ Eshvem Instability	FEA26289	16 862 ly away
➔ Noainentt Expanse	FD9EA251	18 872 ly away
➔ Hiince Sector	FD9EA250	19 020 ly away
➔ Pushdow Adjunct	FE9E824A	20 754 ly away
➔ The Arm of Noumien	FEA3E240	20 999 ly away
➔ Zadeye Cluster	01A0122C	23 207 ly away

Recently visited

all my glyphs ➔

The name of this region, “Ucerie Cloud”, is generated based on its coordinates. It’s an educated guess — probably close to the real name, but not guaranteed. It's an approximation, just what the engine of glyphs.had.sh thinks it might be

➔ return to the home page

➔back to top