S
N
E
W
⤿ 3D ⤾
𖦹Eissentam (10) is a Lush galaxy
Quadrant Gamma γ
Sector 4
  ▗ Block 4
    ☐¹ Cube 1
◇ Region « Jipoff Cluster »
Reachable

This Region is Reachable
it's neither in the Fade or the Core

West - East axis X -411

Near Central Axis
↤ West Spatial Progression
Close to the center

Top - Bottom axis Y -6

Very Close to Galactic Equator
↡ Lower Spatial Progression
Almost touching the middle of the galaxy

North - South axis Z 1550

Intermediate Longitudinal Zone
↧ South Spatial Progression
At the very top or bottom regions

R₀ ≈ 641 431 light years from the core

Navigate to Adjacent Regions

You're in « Jipoff Cluster », where the stars still whisper secrets

FA60EE65
Positioned in the Quadrant Gamma γ of Eissentam, located approximately ≈ 641 431 light years from the galactic core

At 641 431 light years from the core, the region is Reachable ! Tranquil and constant, yet always with the promise of something beyond

Here, in the farthest reaches, the unknown rules

Somewhere in the unknown, this unexplored region is rumored to be a sight to behold

Known Systems in this Region

Name Spectral Locals Wealth Conflict Address
Region's Black Hole
1079FA60EE65
Local Atlas Station
107AFA60EE65
System at Random
     
Random Purple System
  ⚂   


Nearby Known Regions

Tools:
- Orbit: mouse
- Zoom: scroll wheel
- Pan: right click
- FPS:
Juttema Band FC60FE64 980 ly away
Latbeeti Nebula FD5F8E69 9 024 ly away
Ohtani Mass FE5F8E69 9 086 ly away
Luyteno Boundary 0361FE54 10 268 ly away
Yorubaku Quadrant 03609E48 12 309 ly away
Buwariz Expanse FE626E4D 13 670 ly away
Ajhwana Fringe 0262BE53 14 023 ly away
Kiffit Nebula FE62AE50 14 091 ly away
Ogrlio Spur FE631E6B 14 294 ly away
Bobindibl Expanse FE639E71 17 929 ly away
Jobart Cluster FE5E7E7C 18 181 ly away
Sea of Azuturn FD5E6E80 19 341 ly away
Osentie FF61AE97 20 665 ly away
Gopland Shallows 00645E74 22 929 ly away
Recently visited

all my glyphs ➔
The name of this region, “Jipoff Cluster”, is generated based on its coordinates. It’s an educated guess — probably close to the real name, but not guaranteed. It's an approximation, just what the engine of glyphs.had.sh thinks it might be