S
N
E
W
⤿ 3D ⤾
𖦹Eissentam (10) is a Lush galaxy
Quadrant Gamma γ
Sector 4
  ▗ Block 4
    ☐¹ Cube 1
◇ Region « Duzacar »
Reachable

This Region is Reachable
it's neither in the Fade or the Core

West - East axis X -410

Near Central Axis
↤ West Spatial Progression
Close to the center

Top - Bottom axis Y -6

Very Close to Galactic Equator
↡ Lower Spatial Progression
Almost touching the middle of the galaxy

North - South axis Z 1550

Intermediate Longitudinal Zone
↧ South Spatial Progression
At the very top or bottom regions

R₀ ≈ 641 328 light years from the core

Navigate to Adjacent Regions

Here you are, in « Duzacar ». No one expected it

FA60EE66
Found in the Quadrant Gamma γ of Eissentam, roughly ≈ 641 328 light years from the galactic center

At 641 328 light years from the core, the region is Reachable ! In this region, the galaxy stretches wide, with more to discover

In the depths of uncivilized space, only the brave dare to enter

Hidden from the eyes of most, this unknown region may hold some of the galaxy’s most stunning sights

Known Systems in this Region

Name Spectral Locals Wealth Conflict Address
Region's Black Hole
1079FA60EE66
Local Atlas Station
107AFA60EE66
System at Random
     
Random Purple System
  ⚂   


Nearby Known Regions

Tools:
- Orbit: mouse
- Zoom: scroll wheel
- Pan: right click
- FPS:
Juttema Band FC60FE64 1 200 ly away
Latbeeti Nebula FD5F8E69 8 962 ly away
Ohtani Mass FE5F8E69 9 024 ly away
Luyteno Boundary 0361FE54 10 538 ly away
Yorubaku Quadrant 03609E48 12 687 ly away
Buwariz Expanse FE626E4D 13 954 ly away
Ogrlio Spur FE631E6B 14 232 ly away
Ajhwana Fringe 0262BE53 14 232 ly away
Kiffit Nebula FE62AE50 14 333 ly away
Bobindibl Expanse FE639E71 17 826 ly away
Jobart Cluster FE5E7E7C 17 982 ly away
Sea of Azuturn FD5E6E80 19 121 ly away
Osentie FF61AE97 20 278 ly away
Gopland Shallows 00645E74 22 828 ly away
Recently visited

all my glyphs ➔
The name of this region, “Duzacar”, is generated based on its coordinates. It’s an educated guess — probably close to the real name, but not guaranteed. It's an approximation, just what the engine of glyphs.had.sh thinks it might be